• December 18, 2017
    Organize Today
    Learn more about organizing your workplace!

    Click Here
    UnionActive Newswire
     
    Join the Newswire!
    Updated: Dec. 17 (21:01)

    Membership Meeting
    Communications Workers of America Local 2336
    No Shave November
    Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association
    Recognize the Union, You Disrespectful Monsters
    Teamsters Local 888
    United PSAV Tech
    International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees
    The Republican Tax BillCould Affect Railroad Retirement
    Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
    National Labor Relation Board Favors Management Over The Working Man
    Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
     
         
    Member Login
    Username:

    Password:


    Not registered yet?
    Click Here to sign-up

    Forgot Your Login?
    Site Search
    Site Map
    RSS Feeds
    Google
  • Union Density vs. Growth of the Middle Class

    Declining Union Membership Contributes to Rising Income Inequality 

    The graph above, from Think Progress, shows very clearly how union membership rates and the middle-class share of national income have declined together. As they say, though, correlation is not causation. We can know that these two things happened in the same time period in a way that shows up as a startlingly similar line on a graph, but they might be entirely unrelated, or both attributable to some other unmapped cause.

    In this case, though, a new study bolsters the strong implication of that graph: Declining union membership is actually responsible for a significant part of the growth in income inequality. The (paywalled) study, by sociologists Bruce Western of Harvard and Jake Rosenfeld of the University of Washington, uses some terrifically frightening statistics to make this case.

    Western explains that:

    "Most researchers studying wage inequality have focused on the effects of educational stratification—pay differences based on level of education—and have generally under-emphasized the impact of unions."

    Some excerpts from the study, which is in the American Sociological Review 76(4), omitting all the stuff about decomposition and reweighting and so on:

    • We argue that unions helped institutionalize norms of equity, reducing the dispersion of nonunion wages in highly unionized regions and industries. Accounting for unions' effect on union and nonunion wages suggests that the decline of organized labor explains a fifth to a third of the growth in inequality—an effect comparable to the growing stratification of wages by education. (513)
    • [D]eunionization's effects on inequality are only half as large as education's effects for women, but union and education effects are equally large for men. (528)
    • [We argue] that unions not only equalize union members' wages, they also equalize the nonunion wage distribution by threatening union organization and buttressing norms for fair pay. We found strong evidence that unionization rates in detailed industries for geographic regions are positively associated with wage equality among nonunion workers. (532)
    • The decline of U.S. labor and the associated increase in wage inequality signaled the deterioration of the labor market as a political institution. Workers became less connected to each other in their organizational lives and less connected in their economic fortunes. (533)

    In other words, when Republicans and their corporate masters go after unions, they're not just coming for non-union workers next, they're already doing it. And when they tell you that unions are just looking out for their own members at your expense, they're saying something that contradicts the facts.

    Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Fri Aug 05, 2011 at 01:48 PM PDT.

    Also republished by Daily Kos.




    Page Last Updated: ()
  • IBEW Local 73

    Copyright © 2017.
    All Rights Reserved.

    Powered By UnionActive


  • Top of Page image